Blog

  • Senate Caucus Biweekly Report: Sept 5th – 25th 2017

    Screen Shot 2017-11-14 at 1.03.36 AM

    Welcome back to the Senator’s Corner! This is where we will be posting biweekly senator reports. These reports will include:

    1. Senate/Faculty Committee Updates
    2. Highlights from Senate Caucus Meetings
    3. Projects the Senators are working on
    4. Highlights from SSMU Legislative Council
    5. and MORE!

    Check out the highlights from those meetings here in their latest biweekly report!

    A few highlights:

    • Chris Buddle, Dean of Students gave a presentation on the McGill Context, and his work to update the McGill Code of Conduct
    • Suzanne Fortier (Principal of McGill), and Ollivier Dyens (Deputy Provost of Student Life and Learning) attend caucus for the first hour and shared some institutional on Senate and the role of student senators.
    • Discussed the Know Your Rights Campaign, and possible changes for next semester.

    Minutes of each Senate Caucus meeting is available upon request via email.

    If you’re interested in attending a Senate Caucus meeting to learn more about what the Senators do, feel free to email me (the UA Secretary) to get more information. Senate Caucus meetings are held every Monday at 6:30 PM in the SSMU Office.

  • University Affairs Final Report 2016-2017

    Change at McGill University is most often defined by incremental progress rather than overnight transformation. During the 2016-2017 year, the SSMU University Affairs portfolio has successfully pushed forward numerous initiatives to address critical academic, equity, and support issues facing undergraduate students. The University Affairs Final Report highlights some of these collective achievements in the areas of mental health, sexual violence, student rights, accessibility, and more.

    Thank you to the many staff, senators, committee members, councillors, and volunteers who have made this work possible!

  • The African Studies Committee provides a development plan for the McGill University Africana Studies Program Initiative.

    [timeline_excerpt]The development plan was extremely methodical and detailed. It included everything from a statement explaining why such a program is necessary to the complete estimated financial cost, per step, of the entire project and the estimated funding long term funding requirements.[/timeline_excerpt]

  • The Black Student’s Network compiles an anti-Black police brutality document.

    The Black Student’s Network compiles an anti-Black police brutality document.

    [timeline_excerpt]The document was composed of newspaper clippings from various sources and examples of similar cases in Toronto and New York.[/timeline_excerpt]

  • Indigenous students threaten to leave Canadian Federation of Students.

    [timeline_excerpt]Indigenous students threatened to leave the Canadian Federation of Students, of which SSMU was a member, unless the national student lobby group made better representation of Indigenous issues a priority. Many Indigenous students claimed that the CFS was simply not addressing the many concerns of Indigenous students – including treaty rights, self-determination, land claims and settlements, discrimination of campus and the preservation of traditions, cultures, and languages. Some students also had a problem with the Federation’s decision making procedure, which was majority rule, since many Indigenous groups used consensus based decision making. Educational funding was one of the areas that the CFS was said to be most ineffective. While Indigenous student aid was a federal responsibility, the CFS put emphasis on lobbying at the provincial level. The result was many Indigenous students not receiving sufficient postsecondary financial aid.[/timeline_excerpt]

  • McGill Board of Governors loses interest in South Africa.

    [timeline_excerpt]Part of the mandate of McGill’s Committee Advising on Matters of Social Responsibility was to monitor McGill’s divestment from companies with a direct investment in South Africa. The Committee tracked companies that may invest in South Africa by mergers or acquisitions. The companies were then informed that they may have investments in South Africa and McGill has a policy against such holdings. If the companies did not amend their portfolios, divestment would proceed. By 1990, the utility of the Committee was called into question with many suggesting that its process was purely administrative and could be carried out by the University Secretariat.[/timeline_excerpt]